|
酒泉翻译公司关键字：Must first clarify the issue here, namely justice and equality have these basic principles of human boundaries. Since the Enlightenment era, fair justice ﹑ ﹑ ﹑ free basic human rights principles are in fact these are the exact meaning, in particular social justice issue, because the distribution of social wealth involved, its meaning is very determined, specifically three points, The first is the starting point of justice, that equality of opportunity, and the second point is the integrity of the process (which involves the rules of fair competition), the third point is the result of the fair. The first principle of social justice that equality of opportunity in Western society that the market economy has not become a problem, these countries are suffering is the result inequality. Rawls famous "Theory of Justice," published in 1971, when the United States fully adapted to adjust the distribution needs. Rawls explained the two basic principles of justice, the first basic principle is recognized in the United States Declaration of Independence, the principles, the principle difference between the second major emphasis on the principle of compensation to promote the first realization of the principle, intended to care for the weak. As the world is to some extent the process of modernization is the process of Western cultural identity, these principles of human society have a certain universality, whether Eastern or Western countries, only in the modernization process, probably should not be The basic principle of the essence of the question.
But each country有资质的正规翻译公司哪个好 has specific national circumstances, responsible for social science to explain reality, but there is a clear national boundaries. Yao Yanzhi, a country有资质的正规翻译公司哪个好 of thinkers or other social scientists, must make a social reality in which they interpret and respond effectively. Therefore, discussed China's economic专业翻译公司服务最好的 reforms in the justice, we must take full account of the injustice in the end stage of China's nature-what.
Reflect on all the issues of reform, we will find the results of injustice, in fact, the process from the beginning of the injustice and the unjust. A master in the bank credit in the bank staff or the state land department control of land resource allocation power of civil servants in the rich than the competition has been the starting line ahead of the general civilian population. You can get a variety of grant of the privileged class, or been associated with the privileged class of people, their wealth is far more energy can be compared to the general public. Coupled with the stock market, Commodity ﹑ several major real estate bubble in the economic专业翻译公司服务最好的 field, full of black-box operation. Scarce supply of certain goods in the long-standing dual pricing system, led to the discovery plan to allocate prices to find the difference between market price and the formation of "rent" than the discovery of new ﹑ Market, develop new products to improve business专业英语翻译公司科技文件翻译哪里最好 efficiency and other simple, and can be more "profit", so have given up efforts to improve the quality of economic专业翻译公司服务最好的 activity. With the prevalence of bribery, society has gradually formed a number of sub-group, transaction costs (bribery costs) increase. The so-called "tender", "bid" and other decorations on the surface has become the rule, the whole process in a completely opaque state, in which case the big race began to accumulate wealth, do not produce Shiyao fair results. The result is the current situation: some people enjoy the results of the reform, while others bear the cost of reform.
Therefore, China Since the 1980s the "fairness and efficiency" problem of the meaning of war, from the fundamental and the Western countries on the "fairness and efficiency" on the meaning of differences. In developed countries, in the first principle of justice (that is just the starting point) to achieve the conditions, and "efficiency" relative "fairness" means in terms of equality of results. For us this is as a starting point and the process of social injustice is bitter, some theorists have always too much emphasis on "fairness and efficiency" of the conflict, it is completely ignored and the social sciences to solve problems of national boundaries points. It can be said that in the present stage, the starting point injustice served to solve, so that the power to step down from the economic专业翻译公司服务最好的 sphere, in which case, there is no so-called "efficiency first" or "fair first" kind of problem, the right choice only, it can only be: justice first, efficiency, ease them. Share on
|